<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Uncomfortable Truth about Twitter Autofollowing: It Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzambonini.com/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-twitter-autofollowing-it-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzambonini.com/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-twitter-autofollowing-it-works/</link>
	<description>Web, culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Roman</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-twitter-autofollowing-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814081#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>I am struggling to see the benefit of this auto-follow technique?  Is it that you can generate a few spikes, or are those times you posted articles?  Beyond that the general flow of your traffic is not upwards.  

I know this is just one measure, an can and SHOULD be combined with others, but this case the graph isn&#039;t the best visual for the point.  I am finding a consistent strategy of growing audience, using good seo techniques and occasionally re-posting old articles to Twitter is very effective.

Tip of the hat and thanks for your constant writings re: your experiences and how they can help others!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am struggling to see the benefit of this auto-follow technique?  Is it that you can generate a few spikes, or are those times you posted articles?  Beyond that the general flow of your traffic is not upwards.  </p>
<p>I know this is just one measure, an can and SHOULD be combined with others, but this case the graph isn&#8217;t the best visual for the point.  I am finding a consistent strategy of growing audience, using good seo techniques and occasionally re-posting old articles to Twitter is very effective.</p>
<p>Tip of the hat and thanks for your constant writings re: your experiences and how they can help others!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-twitter-autofollowing-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814081#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Hi Liz,

Thanks for the comment. Note that @amorphousblog is not just links; at the moment, about 25% of the tweets on the profile are @ someone. I do monitor mentions and replies on TweetDeck for the account and respond accordingly. It&#039;s also not spam: it only posts a link once a week, and never spams or scrapes links - i.e. it&#039;s not a bad account. It might not necessarily be your thing, but then just don&#039;t follow back. And if you don&#039;t want it following you for some reason then sure, block it.

Thanks for taking the time to comment, 

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. Note that @amorphousblog is not just links; at the moment, about 25% of the tweets on the profile are @ someone. I do monitor mentions and replies on TweetDeck for the account and respond accordingly. It&#8217;s also not spam: it only posts a link once a week, and never spams or scrapes links &#8211; i.e. it&#8217;s not a bad account. It might not necessarily be your thing, but then just don&#8217;t follow back. And if you don&#8217;t want it following you for some reason then sure, block it.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment, </p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Dorland</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-twitter-autofollowing-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Dorland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814081#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I came here after blocking @amorphousblog. I saw it/you followed me this AM, but I routinely block any account that has only links and no conversation. I assume they are just scraping links from those they follow. 

Perhaps that was hasty and you can convince me otherwise. Note that I also usually do a quick google search when I block to be sure that my initial analysis was correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came here after blocking @amorphousblog. I saw it/you followed me this AM, but I routinely block any account that has only links and no conversation. I assume they are just scraping links from those they follow. </p>
<p>Perhaps that was hasty and you can convince me otherwise. Note that I also usually do a quick google search when I block to be sure that my initial analysis was correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

