<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tumblr, SEO, and Why I Moved To WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Web, culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:27:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Traffic</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814042#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>I had the same experience. I had a bunch of blogs on Tumblr, one of the about stock picks and Google never visited the site and never indexed the content. Tooks weeks if not months for a post to show up in the index at all. But in Blogger - with an hour on a brand new blog. 
I think it&#039;s because of the way you can link content in Tumblr. The structure is too easy to abuse. You can see it on Tumblr pages that have a high page rank, you&#039;ll see 3000+ likes with names like &quot;real estate website&quot; as the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same experience. I had a bunch of blogs on Tumblr, one of the about stock picks and Google never visited the site and never indexed the content. Tooks weeks if not months for a post to show up in the index at all. But in Blogger &#8211; with an hour on a brand new blog.<br />
I think it&#8217;s because of the way you can link content in Tumblr. The structure is too easy to abuse. You can see it on Tumblr pages that have a high page rank, you&#8217;ll see 3000+ likes with names like &#8220;real estate website&#8221; as the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Addison</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814042#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>I arrived here on a search for &quot;Tumblr SEO&quot;. I also had the same hunch that Tumblr blogs have no SEO juice, at least not on default settings. I was really interested in starting a Tumblr blog due to the simplicity, but then realised that I&#039;ve never landed, not once, at a Tumblr blog via search. Same goes for the others like Posterous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I arrived here on a search for &#8220;Tumblr SEO&#8221;. I also had the same hunch that Tumblr blogs have no SEO juice, at least not on default settings. I was really interested in starting a Tumblr blog due to the simplicity, but then realised that I&#8217;ve never landed, not once, at a Tumblr blog via search. Same goes for the others like Posterous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Brown</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814042#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no question in my mind about Tumblr&#039;s uselessness for SEO purposes. Google just seems to ignore my Tumblr blogs, despite any tweaking, whereas I can get a WP blog up to PR4 in very little time. It&#039;s the traffic too, though, Google just doesn&#039;t seem to send any traffic to Tumblr.

Having said this, like you, I like the concept and some of the functionality of Tumblr. Ho hum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question in my mind about Tumblr&#8217;s uselessness for SEO purposes. Google just seems to ignore my Tumblr blogs, despite any tweaking, whereas I can get a WP blog up to PR4 in very little time. It&#8217;s the traffic too, though, Google just doesn&#8217;t seem to send any traffic to Tumblr.</p>
<p>Having said this, like you, I like the concept and some of the functionality of Tumblr. Ho hum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tumblr vs Wordpress SEO, Revisited: The Aftermath</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Tumblr vs Wordpress SEO, Revisited: The Aftermath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814042#comment-219</guid>
		<description>[...] Almost four weeks ago, I switch my personal blog (this very one) from Tumblr to Wordpress, because I didn&#8217;t think Tumblr was particularly versatile or good for SEO. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Almost four weeks ago, I switch my personal blog (this very one) from Tumblr to WordPress, because I didn&#8217;t think Tumblr was particularly versatile or good for SEO. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baltimore seo</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>baltimore seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 02:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814042#comment-73</guid>
		<description>The days of appealing to the search engines by &quot;keyword stuffing&quot; your webpage are long gone, but you should still ensure that your keywords appear a few times in the course of your page. I recommend somewhere between a 1% and 4% keyword density. Don&#039;t go any higher than this, or your site will look like a spam site to the search engines, and may be penalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The days of appealing to the search engines by &#8220;keyword stuffing&#8221; your webpage are long gone, but you should still ensure that your keywords appear a few times in the course of your page. I recommend somewhere between a 1% and 4% keyword density. Don&#8217;t go any higher than this, or your site will look like a spam site to the search engines, and may be penalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

