<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tumblr vs WordPress SEO, Revisited: The Aftermath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-vs-wordpress-seo-revisited-the-aftermath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-vs-wordpress-seo-revisited-the-aftermath/</link>
	<description>Web, culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superior SEO</title>
		<link>http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-vs-wordpress-seo-revisited-the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Superior SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzambonini.com/?p=619814063#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Hello Dan.

Good choice, there is not shadow of doubt whatsoever that WP is in a wholly different league than Tumblr when you know what you&#039;re doing with it. 

Even out of the box I expect that&#039;s the case, but once you get it configured properly, it&#039;ll be up, up and away..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dan.</p>
<p>Good choice, there is not shadow of doubt whatsoever that WP is in a wholly different league than Tumblr when you know what you&#8217;re doing with it. </p>
<p>Even out of the box I expect that&#8217;s the case, but once you get it configured properly, it&#8217;ll be up, up and away..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

